Low-cost index ETFs
Query: Low-cost US-listed ETFs tracking the S&P 500, total US market or Nasdaq-100, compared by expense ratio · data as of 2026-10-14
Built a broad-market US index ETF screen (14 ETFs) ranked by expense ratio ascending, with the tracked index flagged as S&P 500, Total US Market, or Nasdaq-100/Composite so the three groups are distinguishable. Includes fund name, theme, expense ratio, AUM, 1M/6M/1Y returns, % from 52-week high, and top 10 holdings. Note: several commonly cited tickers (VOO, IVV, SPLG, ITOT, SCHB, QQQM) are not in our coverage universe; the screen uses the closest available index trackers (VTI, VTHR, SPY, SNPE, QQQ, QQQE, ONEQ, plus value/growth/equal-weight and screening variants). Enriched with per-fund qualitative comments and an index-selection explainer.
Broad-market US index ETFs ranked by expense ratio, cheapest first, with the tracked index (S&P 500, total US market, Nasdaq-100) flagged so the three groups are distinguishable. AUM is shown for context; asset-class-agnostic index exposure dominates the low end of the fee curve, while equal-weight and growth-tilted variants carry a cost premium.
Broad-Market Index ETFs by Expense Ratio — as of October 14, 2026
| Symbol | Fund Name | Index Tracked | Fund Theme | Expense Ratio (%) | AUM ($) | 1M Return (%) | 6M Return (%) | 1Y Return (%) | % From 52W High | Top Holdings | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTI | Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | Total US Market | Total US Market | 0.03% | 2.309e+12 | 1.34% | 9.75% | 16.59% | -1.93% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU, TSLA | The cheapest true total-market exposure in the screen; its near-complete US float coverage makes it the default core building block for a single-fund portfolio, and its tiny fee means minimal drag over long horizons. Slight small/mid-cap tilt vs an S&P 500 tracker is the main structural difference to weigh. |
| SPYV | State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | S&P 500 | S&P 500 Value | 0.04% | 3.525e+10 | 0.37% | 8.25% | 16.60% | -1.86% | AAPL, AMZN, XOM, INTC, WMT, COST, CVX, TSLA, MRK, BAC | Value-tilted slice of the S&P 500; a cheap way to express a rotation away from crowded growth leadership without leaving large-cap US equity. The lean toward energy, health care and staples has been a relative tailwind while megacap tech cools. |
| SPYG | State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | S&P 500 | S&P 500 Growth | 0.04% | 5.386e+10 | 3.16% | 12.49% | 18.00% | -2.98% | NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, AMZN, MU, AMD | The growth mirror of SPYV at the same low fee; concentration in the largest tech and semis names makes it a de facto leveraged bet on AI-complex leadership. Useful as a satellite, but its overlap with a core S&P 500 or total-market fund can be high. |
| MGC | Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | Mega Cap | US Mega Cap | 0.05% | 1.081e+10 | 1.98% | 11.39% | 17.67% | -1.34% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU, TSLA | Mega-cap proxy that mimics a total-market fund's headline composition while skipping the long tail of smaller names; the slightly higher fee buys a cleaner, more liquid top-heavy basket. Convenient for investors who effectively want the largest names without the broad tail. |
| VTHR | Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | Total US Market | US Broad Market | 0.06% | 6.116e+09 | 1.35% | 9.72% | 16.45% | -1.91% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU, TSLA | Russell 3000 exposure — functionally a total US market fund with marginally deeper small-cap coverage than VTI. Higher fee and thinner trading volume are the trade-offs versus the Vanguard flagship. |
| SPY | State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | S&P 500 | US Large Cap | 0.09% | 7.838e+11 | 1.86% | 10.51% | 17.32% | -1.22% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU, TSLA | The deepest-liquidity S&P 500 vehicle and the one institutions and options traders default to; its higher headline fee is often offset by tight spreads and unmatched options depth. Best suited to tactical and derivative-heavy use rather than pure buy-and-hold cost minimization. |
| SNPE | Xtrackers S&P 500 Scored & Screened ETF | S&P 500 | S&P 500 ESG | 0.10% | 2.752e+09 | 1.68% | 10.47% | 19.12% | -2.16% | NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, GOOG, MU, LLY, V, INTC, WMT, ABBV | ESG-scored variant of the S&P 500 that keeps index-like sector weights — designed to track closely while screening out lower-rated names. A pragmatic choice for mandates that require sustainability tilts without a large tracking-error bet. |
| QQQ | Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | Nasdaq-100 | Nasdaq 100 | 0.18% | 4.94e+11 | 3.57% | 14.61% | 21.65% | -4.04% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, MU, AMD, AMZN, META, GOOGL, GOOG, TSLA | The liquidity and options hub for Nasdaq-100 exposure, with a fee premium that reflects its trading ecosystem more than the underlying basket. Its heavy megacap-tech and semiconductor weighting makes it the highest-beta broad index in this screen. |
| SPYX | State Street SPDR S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Reserves Free ETF | S&P 500 | Fossil Fuel Free | 0.20% | 2.771e+09 | 1.83% | 10.35% | 16.34% | -1.38% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, AVGO, GOOG, META, MU, TSLA | S&P 500 tracker excluding fossil-fuel reserves; tracks the index closely while screening out energy reserve owners, so relative performance hinges on the energy weighting rather than a structural style bet. |
| QTOP | iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | Nasdaq-100 | Nasdaq Top 30 | 0.20% | 2.984e+08 | 3.77% | 14.93% | 23.57% | -4.52% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, MU, AMD, META, AMZN, GOOGL, TSLA, GOOG | Concentrated Nasdaq Top 30 basket — a higher-octane, more top-heavy alternative to a full Nasdaq-100 fund. Very small assets and a high fee limit it to a tactical satellite role. |
| RSP | Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | S&P 500 | US Large Cap Equal Weight | 0.20% | 8.912e+10 | -0.50% | 7.00% | 15.28% | -4.79% | MRNA, P, ILMN, CRWD, RVTY, DDOG, A, PANW, AMD, MTD | Equal-weight S&P 500 breaks the cap-weighting that ties the index to a handful of megacaps, making it a direct expression of the breadth/rotation debate. In a tape where breadth has deteriorated, it has lagged, but it is the natural hedge if leadership broadens. |
| ONEQ | Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | Nasdaq Composite | Nasdaq Composite | 0.21% | 1.092e+10 | 2.81% | 11.62% | 18.52% | -3.25% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL, GOOG, AVGO, META, TSLA, SPCX | Tracks the full Nasdaq Composite rather than the curated Nasdaq-100, so it carries a longer tail of smaller listings alongside the megacaps. A middle ground between Nasdaq-100 concentration and true total-market breadth. |
| QQQE | Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF | Nasdaq-100 | Nasdaq 100 Equal Weight | 0.35% | 1.354e+09 | 1.65% | 13.72% | 17.68% | -4.95% | INTC, AMD, META, MRVL, ALAB, ARM, DDOG, MSTR, CRWD, TER | Equal-weighted Nasdaq-100 — strips the megacap concentration that dominates QQQ, making it a deliberate antidote to index cap-weighting. The high fee and wide dispersion vs QQQ make it a targeted tactical tool. |
| SPUS | SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | S&P 500 | Sharia Compliant | 0.45% | 2.724e+09 | 3.06% | 14.44% | 21.13% | -2.42% | NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, AVGO, MU, TSLA, AMD, LLY, XOM | Sharia-compliant S&P 500 variant that excludes interest-bearing financials and other non-compliant businesses; the resulting sector skew, not the index itself, drives the tracking difference. Highest fee in the group, justified only for faith-based mandates. |
Index Selection
Choosing the tracking vehicle, not just the index
Broad US index exposure is now a commodity: several funds track the same or nearly the same benchmark for a handful of basis points. That makes expense ratio the right primary ranking metric — a 0.03% total-market fund versus a 0.35% platform-style fund is roughly a ten-year compounding difference with no change in underlying exposure.
The fee curve here reveals a consistent pattern. The cheapest tier is plain asset-class index replication — total US market and core S&P 500 vehicles. Fees rise as the mandate becomes more specific: ESG screens, fossil-fuel exclusions, equal-weighting, Sharia compliance, or concentrated top-N baskets each add operational and rebalancing complexity, and the fee reflects that. None of those variants is 'better' — they simply track a different, narrower, or actively-maintained basket.
Three groups to distinguish
- S&P 500 — the default core large-cap benchmark. Cap-weighted versions track it identically; value/growth splits, equal-weight, ESG, and exclusion variants are stylistic tilts on the same universe.
- Total US market — adds small- and mid-cap breadth on top of the large caps; closest to owning 'the US economy' in one line.
- Nasdaq-100 / Composite — tech- and semiconductor-heavy, higher beta, and historically more volatile than the broad S&P 500.
Practical read-through
For a long-horizon core, the lowest-fee total-market or S&P 500 fund wins on cost alone. Use the liquidity-rich flagship (SPY) when options and tight spreads matter, and treat the equal-weight and thematic-screen variants as satellite positions whose tracking error is the point, not a flaw. AUM is shown for context only — deep assets mean easier trading and lower closure risk, but they should never override cost for a passive holding.
Run a version of this yourself
Describe the idea in plain English and Relaxfolio returns a researchable shortlist with the charts, fundamentals, and risks attached.
Educational research tool — not investment advice. A screen is a starting point, not a recommendation.